Was it the Wrong Tomb?

The final naturalistic theory of the Resurrection we will examine is the Wrong Tomb Theory. This theory usually purports that Jesus’ body was reburied in His family tomb, known as the Talpiot tomb. Jesus spent the night in Joseph of Arimathea’s tomb, but was then transferred to His family tomb in Talpiot. Upon finding Joseph’s tomb empty, the disciples (or someone) had simply mistaken and then created a resurrection narrative.

Brief History

The Talpiot tomb was first excavated in 1980, was widely known by scholars, and deemed of little significance. It wasn’t until 27 years later that James Cameron’s, The Lost Tomb of Jesus was aired on the Discovery Channel. The film claimed that the Talpiot tomb was Jesus’ family tomb because six of the ten ossuaries (bone boxes) have inscriptions that match names from the New Testament. The claim is that this is too much of a coincidence. They further claim that one ossuary, marked Mariamne Mara (assumed to be Mary Magdalene), would only be present in the tomb if she was Jesus’ wife – since they are of no blood relation.

Issues with the names

First, and probably most importantly, the inscription “Jesus, son of Joseph” found in the Talpiot tomb is not agreed upon by scholars. The inscription isn’t clear and some scholars don’t think it says this at all. If the most important detail can’t be made with clarity, how can the conclusions which follow be clear?

Secondly, almost nobody thinks that Maramne Mara should be understood as “Mary Magdalene”. Attested by other inscriptions, Mara is actually an abbreviation of “Martha”.

As the original excavators observed, the names Joseph, Jesus, Mary, and Judah were all very common names and any inference that this must be the family of Jesus is pure conjecture. It is also nothing more than speculation to say that because DNA tests show that the “Jesus” ossuary wasn’t blood-related to the “Mary” ossuary they must have been married.

It would be quite odd that the tomb of Jesus had no Christian symbols and that Jesus wasn’t inscribed with “Lord,” or some title of the sort. Not to mention, Jesus’ family tomb should have been in Galilee, not Jerusalem, where the site was found.

Issues With a Wrong Tomb Theory

Any theory that claims the body was moved without the disciples knowledge fails because this is exactly what the disciples themselves thought had happened upon finding the tomb empty (John 20:2). Their first assumption was that He had been moved. That they would make up a resurrection doesn’t seem likely. This, coupled with the fact that the disciples almost certainly were not expecting a resurrection, means that they would not have been tricked into a resurrection had the body been moved. They either would’ve been informed, or would have easily found out.

If the body had been moved by the disciples, or someone else, and a false narrative of a resurrection were spreading, the Jewish leaders simply would have presented the body to squander the heresy. They at least would’ve said, “No, his body was moved.” However, this isn’t recorded at all in history. The earliest naturalistic explanation made by the Jewish leaders was that the disciples stole the body.

Had the body simply been moved, Paul (an enemy of Christians) and James (a non-believer) would not have converted. Both of these skeptics claimed to have seen Jesus alive after His death. A misplaced body would not have convinced them to throw away everything they previously believed and give their lives for the sake of spreading the good news that Jesus had actually risen from the dead. Skeptics are only converted after strong evidence, and those who aren’t sure about their beliefs don’t make good martyrs.


This theory doesn’t even attempt to explain how the disciples, Paul and James, and the 500 all came to believe that they had actually seen Jesus after His death – a highly attested fact agreed upon by most scholars. They weren’t convinced because they found an empty tomb. They still needed more evidence. They were convinced that Jesus rose from the dead because they were convinced they had seen Him. Any natural explanation that wishes to carry weight must attempt to explain this.

A couple of common names in a tomb don’t prove anything. Not even the brilliance of James Cameron could polish-up this theory into something believable.

Recommended Reading


Published by Haden Clark

Haden lives in North Texas with his wife, daughter, and three dogs.

9 thoughts on “Was it the Wrong Tomb?

  1. No, I also don’t believe in the alternative Jerusalem grave theory. Israeli archaeologists have been looking for Jesus’ tomb, for many years now- and despite the insistence of a few American friends, there is still no evidence that He is actually buried ANYWHERE.


  2. I had not heard this one before… thanks for mentioning it and addressing it so thoroughly. I really enjoy your apologetic work here! Your posts are tremendously informative, well-conceived, and helpful. Thanks again, M. A,

    Liked by 1 person

  3. “They weren’t convinced because they found an empty tomb.” Thank you for making this statement! It reminded me of a sermon outline I created of John 20; the first point is “Not Impressed by an Empty Tomb.” Throughout this chapter, you can see that the disciples and Mary are not impressed/convinced by a variety of things; the only thing that makes a lasting impression upon them is the presence of Jesus–a very tangible Jesus!

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Thanks for explaining this–I hadn’t heard it before, but it makes sense. They believed because they saw! Even “doubting” Thomas wouldn’t believe his fellow disciples’ word–he had to see and feel for himself!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: